|
|
|
The Role of Soya in Reducing Risk of Breast and Prostate Cancer
Mark J. Messina PhD
President,
Nutrition Matter, Inc.,
Port
Townsend, WA-98368 USA
email: markm@olympus.net
Homepage: http://www.olympus.net/messina
In 1990, the US National Cancer Institute allocated nearly $3 million to
study the anti-cancer properties of soy, the large part because
soyabeans are unique dietary source of isoflavones. Because of the low
breast cancer mortality rates in Asia, most focus was initially on this
particular cancer. More recently, the possibility that soya and
isoflavones reduce prostate cancer risk has attracted attention.
Isoflavones have chemical structure similar to estrogen but bind
preferentially to estrogen receptor beta. However, isoflavones also have
non-hormonal properties that likely contribute to their hypothesized
anti-cancer effects. In vitro, the main soyabean isoflavones genistein
inhibits the growth of essentially all type of cancer cells. Animal
studies generally show that adding soya or isolated isoflavones to
typical laboratory diets reduces mammary carcinogenesis by 25-50%.
However, Asian epidemiological studies provide little support for the
notion that the adult consumption of soya reduces post-menopausal breast
cancer risk. This may be because migration data indicate that early life
experience profoundly affecting later risk of developing breast cancer.
Consistent with this observation are studies showing that rodents
exposed to soya even just briefly during the prenatal and pubertal
periods develop 50% fewer mammary tumors during adulthood. Similarly,
recent epidemiological findings indicate Chinese women who consumed soya
during the teenage years were 50% less likely to develop breast cancer
as adults. The relationship between prostate cancer and soya intake as
been studied to only a limited extent but the data are particularly
encouraging. Isolated isoflavones and isoflavones-rich soya protein
reduce chemically induced and spontaneous prostate tumor development,
and inhibit tumor growth in mice implanted with prostate cancer cells.
Two recently conducted epidemiological studies found that one serving of
soya per day was associated a nearly 70% reduction in prostate cancer
risk. Finally, isoflavones supplements were recently found to decrease
prostate specific antigen levels in patients with uncontrolled prostate
cancer. Overall, although still speculative , the evidence suggest that
early soya consumption during adulthood may substantially reduce
prostate cancer mortality.
In 1990, the US National Cancer Institute allocated nearly $3 million to
study the anticancer properties of soya. At the time, most of the
attention was focused on breast cancer. And while the relationship
between soya and breast cancer risk continues to be a promising area of
research , findings suggest that soya foods may be very important for
important for preventing and even treating prostate cancer. There are
multiple mechanisms by which soyabeans. However, most evidence suggest
the isoflavones are responsible for the hypothesized anticancer effects
of soya. In vitro, genistein, the main isoflavones in soyabeans,
inhibits the growth of a wide range of cancer cells including both
hormone dependent and hormone independent breast and prostate cancer
cells. This short paper briefly reviews the evidence relating to the
effects of soya consumption on breast and prostates cancer risk.
Breast Cancer
The low breast cancer mortality rates among soya foods consuming
populations in combination with data showing that weak estrogen can
function as anti-estrogens prompted initial speculation that soya might
reduce breast cancer risk; this is why earlier age at menses, and later
age at menopause, and hormone replacement are considered to be risk
factors for breast cancer. The first animal study showing that genistein
possessed anti-estrogenic activity was published in 1996. There are
multiple mechanisms by which isoflavones can exert anti-estrogenic
effects although there are no definitive data in humans indicating this
is a case. Of course, because genistein influence several signal
transduction pathways relevant to the growth of cancer cells,
anti-estrogenic effects are not only means by which soya can reduce
breast cancer risk.
Several studies have examined the effects of protein and isoflavones on
the developments of mammary cancer in adult animals. The data are
somewhat inconsistent, but generally show that the addition of soya to a
standard laboratory diet typically does not significantly inhibit tumor
incidence (percentage of animals the group with tumors) but in most
cases, inhibits tumor multiplicity by 25-50%.
Somewhat surprisingly, given the low breast cancer mortality rates in
Asian countries, Asian epidemiological studies provide little support
for the notion that the adult consumption of soya reduces
post-menopausal breast cancer risk, although there is some modest
support for protective effects against pre-menopausal breast cancer. A
few studies conducted among Western population have found soya
consumption is protective. But soya intake in these studies was so
minimal, that the relevance of these findings is unclear.
Early
Soya Consumption
There is a particular
interest in the possible protective effects of early soya consumption on
adult breast cancer risk. This hypothesis is particularly intriguing
because migration data indicate early life events greatly influence the
development of breast cancer in adults. Lamartiniere and colleagues have
consistently shown that exposing rates to genistein through the oral and
intravenous route for short periods during the peri-natal periods and
pre-pubertal periods reduce chemically induced mammary cancer by
approximately 50%. Furthermore, Lamartiniere et al have found that in
their studies, genistein inhibits mammary cancer when given to adult
animals only when first given to animals when young. Recently, Badger
has confirmed the findings of Lamartiniere et al using soya protein
isolate. Finally, and most importantly, Shu et al found that Chinese
women who consumed on average approximately 11g of soya protein per day
during the teenage years were 50% less likely to develop breast cancer
compared to Chinese women who rarely consumed soya during the period.
Possible
Contraindications
Surprisingly, despite
the low Asian breast cancer mortality rates concern has arisen that
soya, because of the estrogen-like effects of isoflavones, may stimulate
the growth of estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast tumors. For this
reason, some oncologists recommend that their breast cancer patients not
consume soya foods. Several observations support this dietary
restriction but overall, the evidence suggests this is an unnecessary
precaution.
At physiological
concentrations genistein stimulates the growth of ER+ breast cancer
cells where only at very high concentrations is growth inhibition
observed. These biphasic effects emanate from the estrogen-like
properties of genistein that become relevant at higher concentrations.
However, cell systems are lacking a host of growth and transcription
factors that likely influence the carcinogens process in vivo, which
suggests in vitro data, may not be relevant to humans.
In contrast to
the bulk of studies that in adult animals soya at least modestly
inhibits mammary glands tumerogenesis, both genistein and soya protein
isolate stimulate tumor growth in ovariectomized immune system deficient
mice implanted with ER+ breast cancer cells. But this model has been
roundly criticized on methodological grounds and in similarly designed
experiments using intact not ovariectomized rodents, genistein actually
inhibited, rather than stimulated, tumor growth. However, two studies in
humans have promoted concerns about women with ER+ breast cancer
consuming soya, as both seem to suggest that soya exerts weak estrogen
like effects on breast tissue. Nevertheless, in a comprehensive review
that examined all aspects of this issue, Messina and Loprinski concluded
that women with breast cancer do need to need discontinue using soya
products.
This review noted
that observational data suggest that it is the progesterone, not the
estrogen, component of hormone replacement therapy that increases breast
cancer risk, and that not even HRT has been shown to adversely effect
the survival of breast cancer patients. This strongly suggests
isoflavones would not be harmful to breast cancer patients since
isoflavones possess no progesterone activity. Furthermore, yearlong
studies recently found that isoflavones supplements in pre-menopausal
women had no effect on breast tissue density whereas in post-menopausal
women, isoflavones decreased density. Factors that decrease breast
tissue density have been shown to be protective against breast cancer.
Prostate Cancer
The International
Prostate Health Council, a European expert committee, recently concluded
that isoflavones were isoflavones were responsible for preventing the
progression of latent prostate cancer to the more advanced forms of this
disease. Thus, soya intake may help to explain why although Japanese men
do develop prostate cancer they rarely die from it. In support of this
contention are intriguing in vitro, rodent, and human data. In vitro,
genistein inhibits the growth of hormone-dependant and independent
prostate cancer cells, independent of growth effects, inhibits the
metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells. Similarly, Geller et al
have shown that in histoculture genistein inhibits the growth of
prostate tisuue from humans with benign prostratic hyperpalsia and
prostate cancer.
Animal Studies
In severe combined
immune-deficient mice implanted with LNCaP human prostate cancer cells,
Zhou et al found that isolated isoflavones inhibited tumor growth in a
dose-dependant manner. Also Dalu et al found that genistein
administration down-regulated epidermal growth factor receptor levels in
the rat prostate despite rather low prostate genistein concentrations.
This suggests, as noted by Zhou et al, that genistein may actually be
more potent in vivo than in vitro, and therefore, than rather high
genistein concentrations required to inhibit the growth of prostate
cancer cells in vitro may be relevant to humans consuming soya. Findings
by Zhou et at agree with those of Mentor-Mrcel et al who foundthat
dietary genistein reduces the incidence of poorly differentiated
prostratic adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice.
Finally, Polland et
al found in several studie that isoflavones rich soya protein inhibits
both spontaneously formed and chemically induced prostate cancer in
Lobund-Wistar rats in comparison to soya protein low in, or nearly
devoid of, isoflavones. Interestingly, based on their work in
Lobund-Wistar rats, Pollanf et al concluded that isoflavones inhibit
prostate cancer but that components in soya meal may inhibit their
anti-carcinogenic effects.
Human
Studies
The epidemiological
data on soya intake and prostate cancer risk are fairly limited, but
worth noting in particular are the results from two prospective
epidemiological studies. In one, Japanese men in Hawaii who consumed
tofu approximately once per day, were 65% less likely to develop
prostate cancer in comparison to men eating tofu less than once per
week. In the other study, Seventh-day Adventist men in California who
consumed soya milk more than once daily were 70% less likely to develop
prostate cancer as men who did not consume soya milk. The pronounced
protective effects of soya consumption inthese studies is striking, but
in both studie the number of men who developed prostate cancer was
realatively small. Still, the observation that such modest amounts of
soya could substantially resuce the risk of prostate cancer is
encouraging.
Relatively, little
clinical work has been conducted but Morton et al did find that
isoflavones levels in prostatic fluid are higher in men from soya food
consuming countries that from countries where soya is not consumed, and
that isoflavones are concentrated in the prostratic fluid by about
two-fold relative to the serum. Thus, the prostate gland is exposed to
high concentrations of isoflavones in men who eat soya foods.
Nevertheless, Urban et al failed to find that soya consumption lowered
prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in healthy men, but this was a
short-term trail, which involved men with relatively low PSA levels.
More importantly, and in contrast to this study, Kucak et al from the
Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan, recently reported that
in a six month study, more than half of the 41 patients with
uncontrolled cancer as determined by a rising PSA level, favorably
responded to daily supplements of isoflavones.
Conclusions
Collectively, the
evidence overwhelmingly supports the notion that if soya consumption
redced prostate cancer risk, isoflavones are responsible for this
effect. Since migration data indicate that late life events influence
prostate cancer risk, this suggests that possibility that even men who
are middle-aged and older who begin to consume even modest amounts of
soya can reduce their likelihood of developing prostate cancer. If soya
even slightly delays tumor onset and/or slows the progression of the
disease, morbidity and mortality from prostrate cancer will be
substantially reduced in high risk countries since prostate cancer is a
disease of older men and tumors are generally slow growing. Men will die
with their cancer rather than of their cancer.
|
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
|
|